How do you balance merit/competence and ethnic representation when recruiting civil servants? If you had to choose, which would you prioritize?
Advocates for a balanced approach based on proportional federalism, prioritizing merit but also including diversity and empowering marginalized groups.
-
Will use a balanced approach based on proportional federalism.
-
Recruitment will primarily be based on merit, but a merit system that includes diversity.
-
Will empower and elevate marginalized groups to maintain proportionality.
Rejects ethnic quotas entirely, advocating for a citizenship-based politics where recruitment is based solely on professional competence and experience.
-
Rejects ethnic representation and quotas in the civil service.
-
Prioritizes professional competence, readiness, and work experience.
-
In case of tied scores, additional exams will be used to determine the candidate, without considering ethnicity.
Believes merit and diversity do not conflict. Recruitment will be merit-based while taking diversity (ethnicity, language, gender, disability) into consideration.
-
Believes merit and ethnic representation do not conflict.
-
Civil service will be organized based on merit while considering diversity (ethnicity, language, gender, disability).
-
Will use merit-based behavioral and technical exams, with a separate consideration for diversity.
Completely rejects ethnic-based recruitment, prioritizing merit, education, and experience, while ensuring inclusion of women, youth, and people with disabilities.
-
Will completely free the civil service from ethnic-based systems.
-
Prioritizes merit, educational background, and work experience over ethnicity.
-
Will include women, youth, and people with disabilities, but will not use special ethnic quotas.